We work on patent applications, landscape analysis, and IP strategy for science-based work — across biology, materials, diagnostics, and sanitation. Our applications carry a unifying thesis: that natural-origin solutions are not just effective but protectable. Below is a sample of what that looks like in practice.
IP work — sample outputs
Patent strategy, landscape analysis, and filing for science-based work. We bring the scientific understanding that generalist attorneys don't.
Write to us ↗Working with us
What do you look for in a potential filing?
Novelty, non-obviousness, and a clear description of what the invention actually is. We often find claim pathways that prior assessments missed — particularly in natural-compound and biological process work.
Do you work with academic groups and startups?
Yes — both. Academic labs often have protectable work they haven't filed. Startups often have weak or incomplete filings. We work with both situations.
What's the natural-versus-synthetic thesis?
A recurring theme in our portfolio — that natural-origin processes, compounds, and organisms can be as effective as synthetic alternatives, and are increasingly protectable on novel process and application claims.